Pancreatic herniation: a large pancreatic mass concealed within the intrathoracic cavity
- 1 Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
- 2 Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine—Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
- Correspondence to Dr Abhinav Karan; abhinav.karan@jax.ufl.edu
Abstract
Cancer of unknown primary is a challenging entity. We present an elderly woman with metastatic cancer of unknown primary despite comprehensive imaging and immunohistochemical analysis. Based on a thorough history, a gastrointestinal source was suspected and a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer concealed within a type IV hiatal hernia was made using multimodal imaging. On review of prior imaging, due to the highly complex anatomy within our patient’s hiatal hernia, the pancreatic mass was retroactively noted. While initial imaging may detect metastatic disease, identifying the primary malignancy requires a thorough history and physical examination, multimodal imaging where malignancy is suspected, and immunohistochemical analysis of metastatic deposits. Herniation of pancreatic cancer has not been previously described in the literature and serves as an important reminder of the importance of multimodal imaging in patients with significantly complex anatomy.
Background
Pancreatic hiatal herniation is an exceedingly rare entity, with very few cases reported in the literature. Furthermore, pancreatic cancer that has herniated into a hiatal hernia has not previously been reported and warrants physician insight into the possibility of malignancies being concealed in regions with highly complex anatomy. Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a challenging diagnostic entity, with much controversy of its optimal management. We aim to highlight awareness of this unreported presentation of pancreatic cancer and to highlight the importance of multimodal imaging to reveal a primary malignancy, particularly when it is concealed within a region of complex anatomy.
Case presentation
An elderly woman in her 70s with a history of coronary artery disease presented to the emergency department following a ground-level fall at home. She reported that she has been feeling particularly weak over the past 2–3 months, and felt as if she had a harder time carrying out her activities of daily living. She notes that walking from her bedroom to the bathroom became progressively more challenging as she would be out of breath and fatigued after activity. The morning of the presentation, she felt particularly weak and as she walked towards her bathroom, she fell forward onto her arms from a standing level. Following this, she reported severe pain to her left upper extremity and the onset of mid-abdominal pain, described as sharp, moderate in severity and constant with no radiation. In the emergency department, her orthostatic vital signs were positive with a change in blood pressure from 143/89 while lying to 113/67 while standing. On further history, she reported a decreased appetite, anorexia and subjective weight loss over the past year. She denied any diarrhoea, steatorrhea, nausea, vomiting, petechiae, purpurae at the time of evaluation and otherwise had no reports. There was no history of tobacco or alcohol use, and she was up to date on all of her cancer screenings. Her physical examination was remarkable for a visible facial laceration and soft tissue injury over the left forearm, and mild tenderness to palpation over the periumbilical region with no radiation to the back.
Investigations
A complete trauma series revealed an oblique fracture through the distal radius and ulna. A CT angiogram of the aorta obtained to rule out an aortic dissection incidentally revealed a large defect in the left diaphragm. Subsequent CT abdomen/pelvis with contrast further revealed a large diaphragmatic hernia with the neck measuring 5.5 cm, containing a rotated stomach and portion of a non-dilated transverse colon. An ill-defined soft tissue lesion (3.9×3.8×3.3 cm) was noted at the neck of the hernia concerning for a necrotic perigastric lymph node (figure 1). Concerningly, numerous hypodense lesions were noted throughout a morphologically cirrhotic liver concerning for metastatic disease. There were no other visible masses noted and a primary cancer site was not identified.
Coronal post-contrast CT image demonstrating a large diaphragmatic hernia, multiple metastatic liver lesions (green arrow), and a soft tissue lesion (3.9×3.8 x 3.3 cm) at the neck of the hernia concerning for a necrotic perigastric lymph node (red arrow).
Her complete blood count revealed a stable haemoglobin concentration 12.9 g/dL, with no leukocytosis, but a mild thrombocytopenia of 1 34 000/mm3. Her renal function profile was grossly unremarkable, with a creatinine of 0.83 mg/dL. Her liver profile revealed a mildly elevated aspartate aminotransferase of 64 IU/L (14–33), normal alatine aminotransferase and elevated total bilirubin of 1.8 mg/dL (0.2–1.0) with a direct bilirubin of 1.2 mg/dL (0.0–0.2). She had elevated tumour markers including a carcinoembryonic antigen level of 109 ng/dL (0.0–3.8), CA-125 of 709 U/mL (0–35) and CA19-9 of >10 000 U/mL (0–35).
Differential diagnosis
Given this information and the patient’s history, a decision was made to pursue a CT-guided biopsy of her liver metastases, which revealed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with positive CK7, GATA3 and a weakly positive CDX2 on immunohistochemistry. While immunohistochemistry can typically assist in localisation of a primary site, with the broad pattern of our case, differentials included breast, lung and upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Given our patient’s history of anorexia, subjective weight loss and laboratory findings, a pancreatobiliary malignancy was most concerning.
A magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was performed, redemonstrating a large hiatal hernia containing a malrotated stomach in mesenteroaxial volvulus and transverse colon (figure 2). Furthermore, the body of the pancreas laid within the hiatal hernia in the chest, and contained a large 3.9×3.5×4.6 cm heterogeneous mass with dilation of the main pancreatic duct to 7 mm and common bile duct to 10 mm (double duct sign), and encased the coeliac, proximal common hepatic and splenic arteries (figures 2 and 3). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) revealed a large, irregular mass within the pancreatic head (figure 4), and subsequent biopsy of the mass confirmed moderately to poorly differentiated pancreatic adenocarcinoma. On retroactive review of prior imaging on the CT scan, the mass previously thought to be a perigastric lymph node was determined to be the underlying pancreatic cancer in a background of highly complex anatomy.
Coronal T2 MRI image shows large mass arising from the body of the pancreas (blue arrow) that is herniated in to the chest. Notice the dilated pancreatic duct upstream (orange arrow).
Axial T2 MRI image shows pancreatic mass invading the coeliac axis (blue arrow) and herniated colon with in the diaphragmatic hernia (green arrow).
Endoscopic ultrasound with large, irregular mass noted in head of pancreas (green arrow).
Outcome and follow-up
The patient was counselled on her final diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with hepatic metastases, and a multidisciplinary meeting was conducted between oncology, palliative care and the patient on potential management options, the patient’s goals of care and her prognosis. The patient eventually opted against any chemotherapy or surgical therapy and opted for hospice care. She was successfully discharged to home hospice care.
Discussion
Pancreatic herniation into a hiatal hernia is an exceedingly rare entity. Of the very few reported cases, patients typically presented with symptoms such as chest discomfort, respiratory reports and epigastric pain due to pancreatitis.1–3 There is only one prior case reported of asymptomatic diaphragmatic herniation of the pancreas.4 CT imaging remains the backbone of pancreatic imaging and has been shown to be equally sensitive (89%) in diagnosing and staging pancreatic cancer compared with MRI.5 An MRCP, however, has a relatively higher specificity of 97%, and in situations where a CT scan is unable to adequately isolate a pancreatic mass, an MRCP may provide further diagnostic information.5 When prior modalities fail to identify a mass and clinical suspicion is high, EUS with biopsy is recommended for confirmatory biopsy.6 Our patient had highly complex anatomy due to her large type IV hiatal hernia, and imaging of the pancreatic body was likely limited by surrounding structures within the hernia sac, explaining the additional benefit of an MRCP in our case.
CUP is relatively rare, accounting for 2%–5% of all cancer diagnoses. This diagnosis requires a thorough pathologic evaluation of adequate tissue specimen and exclusion of a known primary tumour site through a diagnostic workup, including a clinical investigation. Most patients receive an initial evaluation, including imaging studies directed by clinical presentation and immunohistochemical staining of pathologic specimens, which identify a primary site in 30% of patients. Our patient’s immunohistochemical profile presented a broad differential diagnosis. Typically, CK7±with CK20+ and CDX2+ confers a 96.9% sensitivity for a pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal source; however, our patient had a negative CK20 with only a weakly positive CDX2.7 There exists current controversy over whether diagnostic evaluation should be performed beyond initial testing, or if only a focused investigation based on history and physical examination, clinical presentation, histopathologic diagnosis and metastatic sites of involvement. However, based on our patient’s clinical presentation with anorexia, elevated direct bilirubin and significantly elevated CA-19–9, a decision was made to obtain pancreatobiliary tree imaging. This case highlights a previously unreported phenomenon of pancreatic cancer of the body herniating within the chest cavity and highlights the importance of keeping a low threshold for multimodal imaging in the diagnosis of a primary cancer site, particularly in patients with complex anatomy.
Patient’s perspective
I did not think I would have found myself to have cancer after just having a fall. This came as a huge shock to me because nobody in my family has cancer and I always lived a very healthy life. I thought I was just getting weaker because of my age but I did not put all of my problems together until my doctors put it together. I do not want to have anything done for my cancer. I am old now and lived a long life and I do not think going through all the hassle of chemotherapy and surgery is for me. I want to be home and spend the rest of my time with my family.
Learning points
-
The management of cancer of unknown primary is complex, but patient history can typically guide the decision on multimodal imaging of a particular location of the body for detection of a primary.
-
In patients with complex anatomy, it is important to consider multimodal imaging for further characterisation if clinically indicated.
-
Pancreatic cancer has a heterogenous presentation, and physicians should be aware of the possibility of this, and other malignancies being concealed within a complex hiatal hernia.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Twitter @abhz_karan
-
Contributors AbK and AK served to draft and design the submitted manuscript. AS and BG served roles in supervising and editing the submitted manuscript. All authors played a role in patient care and the acquisition of imaging.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer